Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Citation
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Parent Document
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2025-07-17
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
Full Text
303 chars[¶15] Accordingly, the trial court erred in finding that the plaintiffs were not entitled to an 18-month notice period to remove their unit under RSA 205- A:3. Because the defendant provided less than four months’ notice requiring the plaintiffs to remove their unit, the defendant violated RSA 205-A:3.