Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Citation
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Parent Document
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2025-07-17
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
- Dobens v. Fagnant, 2025 N.H. 31 (2025)
Full Text
462 chars[¶6] The plaintiffs filed a complaint in September 2022, seeking a declaratory judgment and damages caused by the defendant’s unfair and deceptive trade practices, and attorney’s fees. Following a bench trial, the trial court found that the defendant did not violate RSA chapter 205-A and did not engage in an unfair or deceptive trade practice. The trial court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration and the plaintiffs subsequently filed this appeal.