Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Citation
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Parent Document
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2013-02-25
Other Sections in This Document (17)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
Full Text
343 charsRSA 540:17 (2007). Because the district division lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate issues related to title, we reject the proposition that a defendant in a possessory action before the district division can challenge a plaintiffs chain of “record title” underlying a foreclosure deed other than by complying with the requirements of RSA 540:17.