Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Citation
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Parent Document
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Jurisdiction
- New Hampshire (state)
- Effective Date
- 2013-02-25
Other Sections in This Document (17)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Schultz, 164 N.H. 608 (2013)
Full Text
536 charsIn New Hampshire, the district division lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate issues of “title of real estate.” RSA 502-A14,1. Thus, although “[t]he district [division] has the authority to adjudicate possessory actions,” Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Cataldo, 161 N.H. 135, 139 (2010), issues of title must be resolved in superior court, see Kevlik, 161 N.H. at 803. In a possessory action in the district division, “the defendant shall not offer evidence which may bring the title to the demanded premises in question.” RSA 540:16 (2007). Rather,