Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/850661.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
Full Text
1,780 charsevidence is introduced sufficient to support a finding that the witness has personal knowledge of the matter.” See State v. Broussard, 25 Wn. App. 2d 781, 788-89, 525 P.3d 615 (2023) (citing State v. Vaughn, 101 Wn.2d 604, 611-12, 682 P.2d 878 (1984)). The proponent of testimony bears the burden of “laying a foundation that the witness had an adequate opportunity to observe the facts to which he testifies.” Vaughn, 101 Wn.2d at 611. The trial court should exclude testimony if “no trier of fact could reasonably find that the witness had firsthand knowledge.” Id. At trial, Dr. Parker testified that Sgt. Hockett told him in December 2021 that he had been experiencing breathing trouble for “some time.” At a follow-up visit in March 2022, Dr. Parker determined the cause of Sgt. Hockett’s shortness of breath by questioning Sgt. Hockett about his symptoms, examining an X-ray of Sgt. Hockett’s chest, and performing a pulmonary function test. Based on the information gathered from these sources, Dr. Parker diagnosed Sgt. Hockett with RAD. Dr. Parker concluded that Sgt. Hockett developed RAD as a result of long- term exposure to car exhaust while working in the West Garage. On cross-examination, when asked whether patients typically develop RAD due to an acute exposure event, Dr. Parker answered that the “classic example of this would be . . . veterans who served in the most recent . . . Iraq wars with a lot of exposure to burn pits where there were . . . persistent smoking . . . exposure. Then they’ve come back and had sort of ongoing respiratory symptoms on a persistent basis.” Sgt. Hockett objected during this answer, and after a sidebar the 25 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. No. 85066-1-I