Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/850661.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
- Wash. Court of Appeals published opinion — 850661.pdf
Full Text
1,752 charsconcerns he has should be forwarded to his chain of command and/or Steve Redmond for action.” The e-mail concludes: “Make it clear that this is an order. . . . I will aggressively follow up if it is violated and this continues.” After learning of Chief Wilske’s order, Sgt. Hockett stopped discussing the issue of CO in the West Garage for over a year. During this time, Sgt. Hockett’s direct supervisor, Lt. John Brooks, reportedly told him that SPD command staff considered him a “problem child” because of his CO reporting and that “if you ever want to go anywhere in this Department, you need to lay low.” Nonetheless, the CO issue persisted. In November 2017, SPD discovered that the ventilation system in the West Garage had been malfunctioning. First, an incorrectly installed part was causing the fan to extract air from the garage less efficiently than designed. Second, the system had been manually set to low speed since 2013 to reduce noise, which prevented the system from automatically increasing the fan speeds when it detected high levels of CO. SPD fixed these mechanical problems. Sgt. Hockett re-raised his concerns about CO in May 2019, when he e- mailed Lt. Brooks that he has “medically documented ailments consistent with daily [CO] exposure at the precinct,” including “an emergency room visit . . . constant fatigue, chronic headaches, sinus issues, and difficulty concentrating or remembering simple things during or after being in the garage for extended periods of time completing required tasks.” Sgt. Hockett’s e-mail also reported that other SPD officers were calling him names such as “CO guy,” “troublemaker,” and “dead man walking” because he reported to his superiors his concerns about CO in the