Leigh Mae Friedline & a. v. Eugene Roe, 166 N.H. 264 (2014)

Citation: Leigh Mae Friedline & a. v. Eugene Roe, 166 N.H. 264 (2014)
Parent Document: Leigh Mae Friedline & a. v. Eugene Roe, 166 N.H. 264 (2014)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 2014-05-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2681753/leigh-mae-friedline-a-v-eugene-roe/ ↗

Full Text

641 chars

Finally, relying upon Moore v. Hill, 97 N.H. 40 (1951), the defendant
argues that the eviction notice was invalid because it was signed only by
Friedline. In Moore, we addressed whether three of four owners of property can
give a valid eviction notice without the consent of the fourth. Moore, 97 N.H. at
41. We concluded that they could not. Id. We did not address, however,
whether an eviction notice is invalid simply because it is not signed by all of
the owners, see id. at 41-42, and the defendant has not cited any authority,
nor are we aware of any, requiring that all property owners must sign an
eviction notice for it to be valid.

Other Sections in This Document (26)

Full Text