Leigh Mae Friedline & a. v. Eugene Roe, 166 N.H. 264 (2014)

Citation: Leigh Mae Friedline & a. v. Eugene Roe, 166 N.H. 264 (2014)
Parent Document: Leigh Mae Friedline & a. v. Eugene Roe, 166 N.H. 264 (2014)
Jurisdiction: New Hampshire (state)
Effective Date: 2014-05-16
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2681753/leigh-mae-friedline-a-v-eugene-roe/ ↗

Full Text

777 chars

The defendant filed a brief statement and plea of title in response to the
writ, arguing, among other things, that the case should be dismissed because
both record owners of the premises did not sign the eviction notice. In his plea
of title, the defendant argued that a constructive trust should be imposed
because “[t]he 2004 conveyance from [the defendant] to [Kellogg-Roe] was
based on the agreement that [the defendant] could live in the house for the rest
of his life.” The defendant also challenged the plaintiffs’ title to the property by
arguing that Brookwood, “as a charitable trust[,] was without authority to give
the house and barn to [the defendant] in 1999 and therefore plaintiff[s] as . . .
assignee[s] without consideration, [do] not own title to the house.”

Other Sections in This Document (26)

Full Text