Sophie F. Bronowiski Mulligan Irrevocable Trust v. Bridges, 44 A.3d 116 (2012)

Citation: Sophie F. Bronowiski Mulligan Irrevocable Trust v. Bridges, 44 A.3d 116 (2012)
Parent Document: Sophie F. Bronowiski Mulligan Irrevocable Trust v. Bridges, 44 A.3d 116 (2012)
Jurisdiction: Rhode Island (state)
Effective Date: 2012-04-10
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2303150/sophie-f-bronowiski-mulligan-ir... ↗

Full Text

1,496 chars

“21. Historic property. Tenant acknowledges that the rented premises is a unique historically significant house which has been carefully and meticulously restored with the advice of historical experts on Victorian and 18th century design. Should any part of the decorated surfaces of the house, including the woodwork or plaster work, be chipped or any wallpaper be torn or marked for any reason other than aging or settling or a casualty of which the Tenant has not been a proximate cause, Tenant agrees to restore the same to the same condition as when the premises were received. Tenant acknowledges that all colors are custom mixed and must be exactly matched to the present color scheme. If exact matching is not possible, this may involve repainting or wallpapering large areas to obtain visual integrity. Removal of all finger marks and restoration of the woodwork and wallpaper to the condition at the beginning of the lease term will be the Tenant’s financial responsibility at the end of the lease term. If Landlord must restore the premises after Tenant’s surrender of possession, Tenant will be liable for the expense and acknowledges that special restorers and experts in painting may be required at more than normal expense to perform such work. * * * If Tenant wishes to paint any room, tenant will obtain first obtain [sic] permission and then Landlord as to color and finish [sic] and Landlord will supply all materials. Painting must be down [sic] to landlord’s specifications.”

Other Sections in This Document (46)

Full Text