Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Citation
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Parent Document
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 1999-06-07
Other Sections in This Document (19)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
- Dyer v. Ryder Student Transportation Services, C.A. 98-4489 (1999) (1999)
Full Text
937 charsStandard of Review In an appeal from the District Court to the Superior Court of a commercial trespass and ejectment action pursuant to G.L. 1956 § 34-18.1-1, et seq., for possession of the premises and nonpayment of rent under the terms of a Commercial Lease, the parties have a statutory right to appeal the judgment and are entitled to a de novo hearing by the Superior Court. G.L. 1956 § 9-12-10; see also Chrysler First Fin. Serv. Corp. v. VanDaam, 566 A.2d 390 (R.I. 1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 936, 110 S.Ct. 2182, 109 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990); Putnam Furniture Leasing Co.,Inc. v. Borden, 539 A.2d 73 (R.I. 1988). Furthermore, "[t]he availability of a hearing de novo at the Superior Court level clearly grants an appellant the right to have the [Superior Court Justice] use [her] independent judgment in ruling on the merits of the case." Finney Outdoor Adver. Co., Inc. v. Cordeiro,485 A.2d 910, 911 (R.I. 1984) (citation omitted).