Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Citation
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Parent Document
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 2004-03-11
Other Sections in This Document (28)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Section 34-18-35
- Section 34-18-35
- Section 34-18-35
- Section 34-18-35
- Section 34-18-35
- Section 34-18-35
- Section 34-18-35
- Section 34-18-35
Full Text
438 charsCatelli argues that the trial justice properly excluded evidence of alleged minimum housing violations because defendants failed to plead the allegations in violation of Rule 8(c) of the District Court Civil Rules, and thereafter never filed a motion to answer out of time. Nor did they request a continuance of the trial so that they could seek to file an answer out of time. Hence, any defenses that could have been claimed were waived.