Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Citation
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Parent Document
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 2004-03-11
Other Sections in This Document (28)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Catelli v. Fleetwood, 842 A.2d 1078 (2004)
- Section 34-18-35
- Section 34-18-35
- Section 34-18-35
- Section 34-18-35
- Section 34-18-35
- Section 34-18-35
- Section 34-18-35
- Section 34-18-35
Full Text
753 chars“I am going to sustain the objection. Apparently just to [simplify] this, you will be offering evidence that the unit is unfit, I guess, for habitation based on its condition. [Plaintiffs counsel] has indicated he is going to object to that line of inquiry. Basically we have a case here that was defaulted in District Court. It comes up here on appeal for a trial de novo. It has not been answered. And being very liberal in * * * allowing this to go forward on the alleged breach which is for nonpayment, I have been liberal in allowing the defendant to have a trial, but you’re going to go into things that have not been pled. Obviously, it would be prejudicial to the plaintiff. * * * So I am going to sustain the objection of this line of inquiry.”