Section 34-18-16
- Citation
- Section 34-18-16
- Parent Document
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Jurisdiction
- Rhode Island (state)
- Effective Date
- 2010-07-09
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Halpin v. Henderson (2010)
- Section 34-18-16
- Section 34-18-16
- Section 34-18-16
- Section 34-18-16
- Section 34-18-16
- Section 34-18-16
Full Text
646 chars2 In the alternative, the Hendersons argued that as they were each granted a .01% interest in Bentley Ventures, LLC, and the Lincoln property was owned by Bentley Ventures, LLC, as part-owners they are not obligated to pay rent. However, as noted in Section Isupra, there is no record of either William Henderson or Bryan Henderson being granted a .01% membership share in Bentley Ventures, LLC. However, even assuming they were granted a minority interest in Bentley Ventures, LLC, such partial ownership would not permit the Hendersons to reside in the property rent free. As such, this argument fails and the Court will not address it in full.