Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Bruner v. Yellowstone County, 272 Mont. 261 (1995)

Citation
Bruner v. Yellowstone County, 272 Mont. 261 (1995)
Parent Document
Bruner v. Yellowstone County, 272 Mont. 261 (1995)
Jurisdiction
Montana (state)
Effective Date
1995-08-03

Other Sections in This Document (227)

Full Text

947 chars
The standard of review for a grant of summary judgment is well settled in Montana. This Court will apply the same evaluation as the district court based upon Rule 56, M.R.Civ.P. The movant must demonstrate that no genuine issues of material fact exist. Toombs v. Getter Trucking, Inc. (1993), 256 Mont. 282, 846 P.2d 265. Once this has been accomplished, the burden then shifts to the non-moving party to prove, by more than mere denial and speculation, that a genuine issue does exist. S.M. v. R.B. (1993), 261 Mont. 522, 862 P.2d 1166. Having determined that genuine issues of fact do not exist, the court must then determine whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Lindey’s, Inc. v. Professional Consult*265ants, Inc. (1990), 244 Mont. 238, 797 P.2d 920. We review the legal determinations made by a district court as to whether the court erred. Matter of Estate of Alcorn (1994), 263 Mont. 353, 868 P.2d 629. ISSUE