Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Grenfell v. Anderson, 1999 MT 272 (1999)

Citation
Grenfell v. Anderson, 1999 MT 272 (1999)
Parent Document
Grenfell v. Anderson, 1999 MT 272 (1999)
Jurisdiction
Montana (state)
Effective Date
1999-11-09

Other Sections in This Document (105)

Full Text

740 chars
¶ The record indicates that in October of 1991, Anderson used the same sublease agreement that had been
rejected by Bice (who owned the print shop), and merely struck out certain provisions in negotiating the
sublease with Houldson. Although the District Court is correct that the Anderson-Houldson sublease provided
that "the premises are in fit condition for use by Lessee as a print shop," and that Houldson’s intended use was
for a computer equipment repair shop, the sublease also provided that "Lessee may use the premises for any
lawful purpose," which would include a computer equipment repair business. The only party who could
rightfully claim that he was misled by a false description, therefore, would be Houldson, not Grenfell.