Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Grenfell v. Anderson, 1999 MT 272 (1999)

Citation
Grenfell v. Anderson, 1999 MT 272 (1999)
Parent Document
Grenfell v. Anderson, 1999 MT 272 (1999)
Jurisdiction
Montana (state)
Effective Date
1999-11-09

Other Sections in This Document (105)

Full Text

483 chars
¶ As for Anderson’s claim for lost profits, resulting from Grenfell’s alleged interference with Anderson’s
sublease with Houldson, the District Court’s findings suggest that the sublease between Anderson and Houldson
was defective, in that it contained "a false and misleading description of the use of the property." This finding
correlates with the "change of use" covenant in the lease, which required Grenfell’s "prior approval" of any
"subsequent change of use" of the premises.