Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Citation
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Parent Document
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Jurisdiction
- Montana (state)
- Effective Date
- 1998-03-31
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/884766/kunst-v-pass/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (71)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
- Kunst v. Pass, 1998 MT 71 (1998)
Full Text
983 chars¶38 Finally, attorney's fees may be awarded only to a "prevailing party," which "means the party in whose favor final judgment is rendered." Section 70-24-442(2), MCA. It was thus entirely proper and necessary for Plaintiffs to wait until after the court had granted them a directed verdict to file a motion for attorney's fees. See § 70-24-442(1), MCA. Plaintiffs immediately requested attorney's fees at the hearing where the court granted a directed verdict, but the court stated it would not consider the motion until a later date after the jury had rendered its verdict. Indeed the court conceded that it probably gave them twenty days after the verdict to file their motion. Montana does not have a statute that provides for a mandatory time limit for filing such a motion, such as the statute that requires the bill of costs to be filed within five days of the verdict. Section 25-10-501, MCA. In sum, we hold that the Plaintiffs' request for attorney's fees was timely.