Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)

Citation
Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
Parent Document
Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
Jurisdiction
Maine (state)
Effective Date
1996-10-15

Other Sections in This Document (46)

Full Text

975 chars
Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (2) of this subdivision [regarding attorney fees] and in Rule 80(d) [regarding attorney fees], when more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment. In the absence of such determination and direction, any order or other form of decision, however designated, except those enumerated in paragraph (2) of this subdivision and in the last sentence of Rule 80(d), which adjudicates less than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties, and the order or other form of decision *510