Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Citation
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Parent Document
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Jurisdiction
- Maine (state)
- Effective Date
- 1996-10-15
Other Sections in This Document (46)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
- Monopoly, Inc. v. Aldrich, 683 A.2d 506 (1996)
Full Text
601 charsThe trial court denied the Aldriches any further attorney fees beyond those awarded in the partial summary judgment on the ground that “the defendants have not prevailed in their additional claim for double damages.” The lease contract itself does not define “prevailing party.” This Court, however, in the similar context of awarding trial costs pursuant to the rules of civil procedure, has interpreted the term “prevailing party” as unambiguous and meaning a party prevailing with reference to the suit as a whole. As we stated in Inhabitants of Sabattus v. Bilodeau, Me., 395 A.2d 123, 124 (1978):