Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Citation
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Parent Document
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Jurisdiction
- Maine (state)
- Effective Date
- 1909-04-06
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5118602/briggs-v-chase/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (19)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
- Briggs v. Chase, 105 Me. 317 (1909)
Full Text
485 chars*321No question can arise in regard to the consideration. The stipulation that the lessee should have the privilege of renewing "was part of the consideration for which he took a lease,” and agreed to pay the sum of $160 per year. Sweetser v. McKenney, 65 Maine, 225. The defendant, therefore, has paid for his option as well as for his use and occupation. The plaintiff had received consideration for it. No new consideration was required. 24 Cyc. 995. Hunter v. Silvers, 11 Ill. 124.