Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Union River Associates v. Budman, 2004 ME 48 (2004)

Citation
Union River Associates v. Budman, 2004 ME 48 (2004)
Parent Document
Union River Associates v. Budman, 2004 ME 48 (2004)
Jurisdiction
Maine (state)
Effective Date
2004-04-08

Other Sections in This Document (49)

Full Text

566 chars
Budman contends that the District Court erred when it (1) concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to consider Budman’s affirmative defense related to his claim of a civil rights violation on the basis of religion, and (2) excluded evidence under the authority of M.R. Evid. 408(a) regarding Budman’s affirmative defense that the parties reached an accord and satisfaction. Because we conclude that the court erred in excluding evidence of an accord and satisfaction, we vacate the judgment in part and remand for further proceedings solely on that issue. I. BACKGROUND