Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Zitomer v. Palmer, 446 A.2d 1084 (1982)

Citation
Zitomer v. Palmer, 446 A.2d 1084 (1982)
Parent Document
Zitomer v. Palmer, 446 A.2d 1084 (1982)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1982-04-16

Full Text

517 chars
We must not be unmindful that the purpose of summary process is to provide an expeditious remedy to a landlord in order to remove a holdover tenant. Prevedini v. Mobil Oil Corporation,164 Conn. 287, 292, 320 A.2d 797 (1973). In a summary process action, speed is of the essence. Mayron's Bake Shops, Inc. v. Arrow Stores, Inc., 149 Conn. 149,154, 176 A.2d 574 (1961). Summary process is meant to be simple, uncluttered, and, above all, summary. Atlantic Refining Co. v. O'Keefe,131 Conn. 528, 530, 41 A.2d 109 (1945).