Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Citation
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Parent Document
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1979-05-10
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3369734/urban-v-prims/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
Full Text
445 charsNo leasehold interest is required for dispossession under § 47a-23. If the defendant’s statement of law were correct, then trespassers and squatters would enjoy far more rights than legitimate tenants. Section 47a-23 provides for dispossession against any person “who has no right or privilege to occupy such premises, or where one originally had the right or privilege to occupy such premises but such right or privilege has terminated . . . .”