Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Citation
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Parent Document
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1979-05-10
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3369734/urban-v-prims/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Urban v. Prims, 406 A.2d 11 (1979)
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
- Section 47a-23
Full Text
371 charsNo further explanation is provided. The tenant, at argument, contended in effect that the summary process proceedings were vitiated because the plaintiff’s predecessor in title was the owner at the time of the service of the notice to quit. The named plaintiff, in the interval between the notice to quit and the issuance of the complaint, purchased the subject property.