Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Citation
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Parent Document
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1986-06-30
Other Sections in This Document (65)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
- Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
Full Text
639 charsSince both parties agree that the option was exercised, a landlord-tenant relationship obviously existed. The question of whether PJR, Inc., is an indispensible party depends upon whether PJR, Inc., had the status of “tenant” when the plaintiff by service of the notice to quit on December 10, 1984, purported to terminate the lease. It is undisputed that the notice to quit was served on the defendant and not on the corporation. Service of a notice to quit on the tenant is, of course, an indispensible prerequisite to the maintenance of a summary process action. O’Keefe v. Atlantic Refining Co., 132 Conn. 613, 621, 46 A.2d 343 (1946).