Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)

Citation
Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
Parent Document
Haddad v. Francis, 537 A.2d 174 (1986)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1986-06-30

Other Sections in This Document (65)

Full Text

460 chars
is by whom. The plaintiff contends that the defendant exercised the option to renew on or about May, 1982. The defendant urges that the option was exercised by PJR, Inc. In the lease, a condition of the right to renew is a written notice from the tenant of the intention to exercise the option. Unfortunately, no such written notice which, by its terms would have identified the option or was ever introduced into evidence. Presumably no such notice was given.