Section 47a-20a
- Citation
- Section 47a-20a
- Parent Document
- Murphy v. Baez, 515 A.2d 383 (1986)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 1986-03-24
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/3360686/murphy-v-baez/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (26)
- Murphy v. Baez, 515 A.2d 383 (1986)
- Murphy v. Baez, 515 A.2d 383 (1986)
- Murphy v. Baez, 515 A.2d 383 (1986)
- Murphy v. Baez, 515 A.2d 383 (1986)
- Murphy v. Baez, 515 A.2d 383 (1986)
- Murphy v. Baez, 515 A.2d 383 (1986)
- Murphy v. Baez, 515 A.2d 383 (1986)
- Murphy v. Baez, 515 A.2d 383 (1986)
- Murphy v. Baez, 515 A.2d 383 (1986)
- Murphy v. Baez, 515 A.2d 383 (1986)
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
- Section 47a-20a
Full Text
399 charsthe presumption in the present case is clearly rebutted because the proscribed act by the landlord was itself an eviction, and as a result, the plaintiff’s intent to evict was established prior to the tenant’s complaint to the authorities. The defendant, however, contends that the presumption can only be rebutted by proof of one or more of the reasons set out in § 47a-20a of the General Statutes.