Section 47a-15
- Citation
- Section 47a-15
- Parent Document
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2010-11-02
Other Sections in This Document (64)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- St. Paul's Flax Hill Co-Operative v. Johnson, 6 A.3d 1168 (2010)
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
- Section 47a-15
Full Text
733 charsOn the basis of the plain language of the statute, we conclude that the protections of § 47a-15 do not inure to the defendant in this case. The defendant was not a tenant. The summary process complaint states unequivocally that the defendant had “no legal right to occupy the [premises,” as did the notice to quit. The defendant, having no right or privilege to occupy the premises, was not entitled to a separate pretermination notice pursuant to § 47a-15 because he could not remedy the violation except by his quitting the premises. Accordingly, the defendant’s claim that the notice to quit was rendered defective because the plaintiff served simultaneously a pretermination notice fails because § 47a-15 does not apply to him. 8