Section 47a-21
- Citation
- Section 47a-21
- Parent Document
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-11-11
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7912426/johnson-v-mazza/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
Full Text
645 charsWe recognize that Practice Book § 10-44 permits a party to file a new pleading within fifteen days after a motion to strike has been granted, which the plaintiff failed to do. Although there is no case law requiring a party to replead after a motion to strike has been granted, in this instance, even if the plaintiff were required to file a new pleading after the complaint was stricken, he would not have had to do so in this case. “[T]he law does not require the performance of a futile act.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Barber v. *163Jacobs, 58 Conn. App. 330, 336, 753 A.2d 430, cert. denied, 254 Conn. 920, 759 A.2d 1023 (2000). II