Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Citation
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Parent Document
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2003-11-11
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7912426/johnson-v-mazza/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Johnson v. Mazza, 80 Conn. App. 155 (2003)
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
- Section 47a-21
Full Text
628 charsThe crux of the plaintiffs claim is that the court improperly granted the defendant’s motion to strike because he was not required to provide the defendant, his landlord, with a forwarding address under § 47a-21 (d) (2) to state a cause of action for the return of the security deposit and for double damages. Accordingly, we are required to interpret § 47a-21 (d) (2) to determine whether a plaintiff is first required to provide a landlord with a forwarding address to afford himself the double damages remedy given to tenants who have not had their security deposits returned within thirty days after terminating the tenancy.