Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Citation
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Parent Document
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2004-10-05
Other Sections in This Document (11)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
Full Text
339 charsWe granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment with respect to the plaintiffs negligence claim?” Mamudovski v. BIC Corp., 266 Conn. 915, 833 A.2d 467 (2003). *300