Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Citation
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Parent Document
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2004-10-05
Other Sections in This Document (11)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
- Mamudovski v. BIC CORPORATION, 857 A.2d 328 (2004)
Full Text
806 charsThe first count alleged negligence, based on an incident that had occurred on February 9, 1994, in which the plaintiff, having been notified of her discharge by the defendant and having been escorted to her car by the defendant’s agents, fainted while driving her car from the defendant’s premises and collided with a telephone pole. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant’s agents were negligent in failing to prevent her from driving when they knew or should have known that it would not be safe for her to do so. The second count alleged retaliatory discharge in violation of General Statutes § 31-290a, in that the plaintiffs discharge was in retaliation for the exercise of her rights under the Workers’ Compensation Act, and the third count alleged wrongful discharge in violation of public policy.