Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Citation
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Parent Document
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2010-06-15
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2099534/zapata-v-mora/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (23)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
Full Text
797 charsthe plaintiff landlords served a notice to quit for nonpayment of rent on the defendant tenants and filed a summary process complaint. Id., 462. The plaintiff subsequently withdrew the summary process action in its entirety and, thereafter, filed a new summary process complaint but did not serve a new notice to quit. Id., 463. The defendants moved to dismiss the new summary process action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, claiming that the plaintiffs were required to serve a new notice to quit prior to commencing the new summary process action. Id. Our Supreme Court agreed and concluded that if a landlord has withdrawn a summary process action filed against a tenant, the landlord is required to serve a new notice to quit prior to commencing a new summary process action. Id., 465.