Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Citation
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Parent Document
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Jurisdiction
- Connecticut (state)
- Effective Date
- 2010-06-15
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2099534/zapata-v-mora/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (23)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
- Zapata v. Mora, 996 A.2d 1203 (2010)
Full Text
263 charsto . . . the premises” [emphasis added]). Accordingly, we agree with the court that the restoration order did not constitute a new tenancy, and, therefore, no new notice to quit was required. The judgment is affirmed. In this opinion the other judges concurred. 1