Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Colchester Estate Ventures, LLC v. Madden, 229 Conn. App. 811 (2024)

Citation
Colchester Estate Ventures, LLC v. Madden, 229 Conn. App. 811 (2024)
Parent Document
Colchester Estate Ventures, LLC v. Madden, 229 Conn. App. 811 (2024)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2024-12-24

Other Sections in This Document (26)

Full Text

684 chars
The defendant claims that the court erred in denying
       his motion to restore because he had a vested right
       to litigate the allegations of malfeasance made in that
       motion and the supporting attachments. Relying heavily
       on this court’s decision in Palumbo v. Barbadimos, 163
       Conn. App. 100, 134 A.3d 696 (2016), he argues that the
       plaintiff’s withdrawal was an improper tactical maneu-
       ver designed to avoid an unfavorable ruling on his alle-
       gations of wrongdoing and request for sanctions, and
       that the court should have restored the case in order
       to afford him a speedy resolution of his claims. We
       disagree.