Colchester Estate Ventures, LLC v. Madden, 229 Conn. App. 811 (2024)

Citation: Colchester Estate Ventures, LLC v. Madden, 229 Conn. App. 811 (2024)
Parent Document: Colchester Estate Ventures, LLC v. Madden, 229 Conn. App. 811 (2024)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 2024-12-24
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10303097/colchester-estate-ventures-llc... ↗

Full Text

1,014 chars

The plaintiff filed its opposition to the defendant’s
       motion on June 21, 2023. On July 5, 2023, the defendant
       moved for an extension of time to file his reply to the
       plaintiff’s opposition. The court, Hon. Francis J. Foley
       III, judge trial referee, granted that motion on July 6,
       2023, and ordered that ‘‘[t]he reply may be filed on the
       date set for trial.’’ On July 19, 2023, prior to trial and
       before the defendant had filed his reply, the plaintiff
       withdrew the summary process action.1
         1
           Although the plaintiff’s withdrawal form does not state a reason for the
       withdrawal, the plaintiff represents in its appellee’s brief that it withdrew
       the summary process action because, ‘‘[u]pon review of the file and the
       pleadings in preparation [for] trial,’’ it concluded that ‘‘certain deficiencies
       did in fact exist.’’
Page 2                        CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL                                   0, 0

Other Sections in This Document (26)

Full Text