Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Conaway v. Prestia, 191 Conn. 484 (1983)

Citation
Conaway v. Prestia, 191 Conn. 484 (1983)
Parent Document
Conaway v. Prestia, 191 Conn. 484 (1983)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1983-09-13

Other Sections in This Document (66)

Full Text

487 chars
In a subsidiary claim, the defendants bemoan the fact that the trial court failed to specify what actions of the defendants constituted unfair or deceptive acts or practices. While we disagree with the defendants’ contention that it is unclear what facts the court relied upon in rendering its decision, the short answer to the defendants’ claim is that they failed to file a motion for articulation with the trial court. Barnes v. Barnes, 190 Conn. 491, 493-94, 460 A.2d 1302 (1983). 11