Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Conaway v. Prestia, 191 Conn. 484 (1983)

Citation
Conaway v. Prestia, 191 Conn. 484 (1983)
Parent Document
Conaway v. Prestia, 191 Conn. 484 (1983)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
1983-09-13

Other Sections in This Document (66)

Full Text

414 chars
Additionally, the court concluded that the plaintiffs were entitled to damages under the provisions of CUTPA. Noting the continued collection of rents despite the uninhabitability of the apartments and without certificates of occupancy as required by §§ 47a-5 and 47a-57 and as ordered by New Britain officials, the court characterized the actions of the defendants as “unfair or deceptive acts or practices.” *489