Balint v. Casale, 40 Conn. App. 595 (1996)

Citation: Balint v. Casale, 40 Conn. App. 595 (1996)
Parent Document: Balint v. Casale, 40 Conn. App. 595 (1996)
Jurisdiction: Connecticut (state)
Effective Date: 1996-03-12
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7907841/balint-v-casale/ ↗

Full Text

804 chars

We agree with the plaintiffs that whether they made the requisite complaints was an issue of fact for the trial court. “The factual findings of a trial court on any issue are reversible only if they are clearly erroneous. . . . This court cannot retry the facts or pass upon the credibility of the witnesses.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Rosick v. Equipment *599Maintenance & Service, Inc., 33 Conn. App. 25, 40, 632 A.2d 1134 (1993). The trial court heard testimony regarding the twenty-six complaints filed with the Dan-bury health department. On the basis of our review of the record, we conclude that the trial court’s finding that the plaintiffs made complaints to the Danbury health department twenty-one days prior to filing their complaints is not clearly erroneous. II

Other Sections in This Document (18)

Full Text