Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Citation
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Parent Document
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 1997-06-27
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8352844/clegg-v-vaughan/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (22)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
- Clegg v. Vaughan, 7 Mass. L. Rptr. 134 (1997)
Full Text
773 charsOn October 31, 1996, the District Court (Black, J.) allowed Vaughan’s motion to waive the appeal bond and ordered her to make rental payments to the Superior Court pending appeal. Vaughan thus paid monthly rent to this Court for the period from December 1996 through May 1997. On May 14, 1997, before Vaughan filed her notice of appeal, this Court allowed Clegg’s motion to release the rental payments from escrow to him. There is nothing in the statutory provision regarding bond requirements that prevents the Court from taking this action. The only bond requirement relates to an appeal by the tenant from a judgment for possession for the landlord. Vaughan is not appealing on the issue of possession, having prevailed thereon. Thus, the bond requirement is moot. ORDER