Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Citation
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Parent Document
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 2008-12-01
Other Sections in This Document (15)
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
- Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
Full Text
600 charsManzaro also moves for summary judgment on Brooks’ chapter 93A claim, alleging that Brooks failed to send a proper demand letter and that, therefore, dismissal of the claim is required. G.L.c. 93A, §9(3); Boston v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 339 Mass. 569, 574 (1987). Brooks does not dispute Manzaro’s fatal claim that Brooks failed to send a demand letter. Because Brooks has not responded with facts that would establish the existence of a genuine issue for trial on his chapter 93A claim, Manzaro is entitled to summary judgment on this count. See Pederson v. Time, Inc., 404 Mass. 14, 17 (1989). ORDER