Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)

Citation: Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
Parent Document: Brooks v. Manzaro, 25 Mass. L. Rptr. 31 (2008)
Jurisdiction: Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date: 2008-12-01
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/8357021/brooks-v-manzaro/ ↗

Full Text

483 chars

In support of his motion, Manzaro contends that: (1) the ice was a natural accumulation for which recovery is not allowed; (2) a natural accumulation is not a defect that violates the implied warranty of habitability, nor do the State Sanitary Code or Building Code apply; and (3) no demand letter was sent as required by chapter 93A. After consideration, and for the reasons set forth below, Manzaro’s motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. *32BACKGROUND

Other Sections in This Document (15)

Full Text