John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Citation
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Parent Document
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 2019-02-06
Other Sections in This Document (11)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
Full Text
553 charsFactor 7 (one victim was extrafamilial); factor 12 (documented antisocial behavior while in custody between 1986 and 2009); factor 16 (Doe sexually abused child victims in public place); factor 18 (five- and six year old victims were extra-vulnerable); factor 19 (high level of physical contact, including forced oral sex and vaginal penetration); factor 21 (diverse victim types); and factor 22 (multiple victims). The hearing examiner also gave "minimal" weight to factor 10 (prior contact with criminal justice system arising from a juvenile matter).