John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Citation
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Parent Document
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 2019-02-06
Other Sections in This Document (11)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
- John Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 123 N.E.3d 800 (2019)
Full Text
611 charsThird, the plaintiff suggests that the hearing examiner did not properly consider and weigh his more recent behavior. He contends that at some point during the time that he was civilly committed as a sexually dangerous person and since his 2009 release from that commitment, his "treatment eventually sank in." According to him, his "quest to rehabilitate himself, his treatment success, [and] his age and significant time in the community (among other things)" all admit of only one reasonable conclusion: that "there is not enough evidence to support [the] level 2" final classification decision. We disagree.