M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- Citation
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- Parent Document
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 2019-02-21
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7178777/mlm-v-em/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (24)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
- M.L.M. v. E.M., 123 N.E.3d 802 (2019)
Full Text
599 charsDiscussion. 1. Lack of factual findings. The defendant argues that the judge erred by not explicitly making factual findings on the record to support the extension order. But the defendant points to no statute or case that requires the judge to make such findings, and this court has not required specific findings of fact in these cases. See, e.g., Ginsberg v. Blacker, 67 Mass. App. Ct. 139, 140 n.3 (2006). "Indeed, where we are able to discern a reasonable basis for the order in the judge's rulings and order, no specific findings are required." G.B. v. C.A., 94 Mass. App. Ct. 389, 396 (2018).