Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Mellor v. Berman, 454 N.E.2d 907 (1983)

Citation
Mellor v. Berman, 454 N.E.2d 907 (1983)
Parent Document
Mellor v. Berman, 454 N.E.2d 907 (1983)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
1983-10-03

Other Sections in This Document (42)

Full Text

545 chars
The plaintiffs argue that the lessor was not entitled to retain any portion of the security deposit because her counterclaim was forfeited as a result of improper notice. This question was not reported, however. See note 6, infra. Hence, the question is not before us. Similarly, we do not reach the issue of the applicability of G.L.c. 93A, as the matter is not before us. See Hampshire Village Assocs. v. District Court of Hampshire, 381 Mass. 148, 154-155, cert. denied sub nom. Ruhlander v. District Court of Hampshire, 449 U.S. 1062 (1980).