Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

Taylor v. Beaudry, 75 Mass. App. Ct. 411 (2009)

Citation
Taylor v. Beaudry, 75 Mass. App. Ct. 411 (2009)
Parent Document
Taylor v. Beaudry, 75 Mass. App. Ct. 411 (2009)
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts (state)
Effective Date
2009-10-15

Full Text

347 chars
He did not do that12 and, consequently, was not entitled to retain any part of the deposit. See, e.g., Mellor v. Berman, 390 Mass. 275, 276 n.4 (1983) (“The purpose of requiring specific itemization is to ensure ‘that landlords do not make spurious and unfounded deductions for damage’ ”), quoting from McGrath v. Mishara, 386 Mass. 74, 80 (1982).