§ 1437f
- Citation
- § 1437f
- Parent Document
- Scott Realty Group Trust v. Charland (2020)
- Jurisdiction
- Massachusetts (state)
- Effective Date
- 2020-10-28
Other Sections in This Document (205)
- Scott Realty Group Trust v. Charland (2020)
- Scott Realty Group Trust v. Charland (2020)
- Scott Realty Group Trust v. Charland (2020)
- Scott Realty Group Trust v. Charland (2020)
- Scott Realty Group Trust v. Charland (2020)
- Scott Realty Group Trust v. Charland (2020)
- Scott Realty Group Trust v. Charland (2020)
- Scott Realty Group Trust v. Charland (2020)
- Scott Realty Group Trust v. Charland (2020)
- Scott Realty Group Trust v. Charland (2020)
- Scott Realty Group Trust v. Charland (2020)
- Scott Realty Group Trust v. Charland (2020)
- Scott Realty Group Trust v. Charland (2020)
- Scott Realty Group Trust v. Charland (2020)
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 1437f
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
- § 3
Full Text
757 chars11Although two HAP contracts were admitted as exhibits at
trial, the record appendix contains only the one running from
December 1, 2011, to November 30, 2012. In other words, the
document in the record was not in effect at the time Charland's
tenancy was terminated. Nonetheless, because the parties do not
dispute that the authority continued to pay the Section 8
subsidy amount to the landlord, it is reasonable to infer that a
HAP contract remained in place for the duration of Charland's
tenancy. The parties have given us no reason to think that the
terms of the HAP contract between the landlord and the authority
were different at the time the landlord sought to terminate her
7