Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Citation
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Jurisdiction
- Washington (state)
- Source verification
- official_capture_completeness_unverified
- Original Source
- https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/901791.pdf ↗
Related Parts of This Source
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
- Wash. Supreme Court published opinion — 901791.pdf
Full Text
1,737 charsterm. /d. at 4-5 (noting that short-term leases gave the park owner a near dictatorial
authority because tenants are faced with the option of either abiding by the terms of
12
Western Plaza, LLC v. Tison, No. 90179-1
a new lease, including rent increases or other odious provisions, or relocating their
residence at significant cost).
The purpose of the real estate statute of frauds is to prevent fraud in contractual
undertakings. Firth v. Lu, 146 Wn.2d 608, 614, 49 P.3d 117 (2002) (citing Miller v.
McCamish, 78 Wn.2d 821, 828, 479 P.2d 919 (1971)). The MHLTA specifically
addresses concerns of fraud by requiring that all rental agreements under the MHLTA
must be based on a written rental agreement that is signed by the parties, regardless
of the duration of the rental. RCW 59.20.060(1 ). In most tenancies, acknowledgement
serves as an additional protection against fraud in agreements that would encumber
land for over a year. But unlike most leases, the presumption under the MHLTA is for
a longer-term lease; acknowledgement provides an additional burden but no
additional protections from fraud than a writing provides.
The legislature created these protections for renters of mobile home lots in the
MHLTA. "Unless otherwise agreed rental agreements shall be for a term of one year,"
and landlords may not "offer a mobile home lot for rent to anyone without offering a
written rental agreement for a term of one year or more." RCW 59.20.090(1 ), .050(1 ).
"Any rental agreement of whatever duration shall be automatically renewed for the
term of the original rental agreement, unless a different specified term is agreed upon."