Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Showing 41–60 of 235 results

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps. (2023) Washington state

unlawful lease provisions are and relate to (a) the excessive security deposit, (b)

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps. (2023) Washington state

Hoskins charged Tenants a security deposit of $2,800 despite a monthly rent of

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps. (2023) Washington state

timely give them a security deposit statement when he e-mailed the statement to

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps. (2023) Washington state

accounting of the security deposit indicating a total refund of $346.13. He then

Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000)

Carlstrom v. Hanline, 990 P.2d 986 (2000) Washington state

there is no inherent ambiguity. The additional terms in paragraph 16 relate to the $200 security deposit found in paragraph 14. The six-month provision is used solely to measure whether the deposit is *786

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps. (2023) Washington state

he charged and collected a security deposit in excess of the monthly rent and a

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps., 534 P.3d 412 (2023) Washington state

The trial court concluded that Hoskins charged a security deposit in excess

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps., 534 P.3d 412 (2023) Washington state

award damages based on the security deposit violation because it found that

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps., 534 P.3d 412 (2023) Washington state

double any penalties imposed, (3) double the amount of any security deposit

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps., 534 P.3d 412 (2023) Washington state

subsection (b) provides two ways to “give” the required security deposit statement

Silver v. Rudeen Mgmt. Co., Inc., 197 Wash. 2d 535 (2021)

Silver v. Rudeen Mgmt. Co., Inc., 197 Wash. 2d 535 (2021) Washington state

15 This understanding of the nature of the security deposit is consistent with recent revisions to the URLTA, which clarify that the security deposit remains the property of the tenant and that the landlord’s interest in the deposit is...

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps., 534 P.3d 412 (2023) Washington state

withhold a security deposit. Because Hoskins violated SMC 7.24.035(A), SMC

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps., 534 P.3d 412 (2023) Washington state

unlawful lease provisions are and relate to (a) the excessive security deposit, (b)

James S. Black & Co. v. Charron, 22 Wash. App. 11 (1978)

James S. Black & Co. v. Charron, 22 Wash. App. 11 (1978) Washington state

...The issues raised on appeal are: (1) whether replacement of 100 percent of the carpeting was reasonable; (2) whether Charron held over for 19 days; (3) whether the security deposit returned to Charron acted as a release or *13an accord...

Section Cmty

Virginia Chiu & Vincent Liew, Appellants\cross-resps. V. Brian Hoskins, Respondent\cross-apps., 534 P.3d 412 (2023) Washington state

Hoskins charged Tenants a security deposit of $2,800 despite a monthly rent of